Not everyone carrying an axe is just a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Probably not, since most lumberjacks do not generally carry their axes around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence took place in a town club in Fontaniva, Italy, the place where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact his revenge on some slots that are unsuspecting after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in two weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video clip streaming internet sites, where people can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing down vapor, the machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but perhaps not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either it was a sign of victory, or a show of friendship towards these particular machines. Whenever coping with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.
‘ He comes in here all the time to play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a complete lot of cash. He could be a laborer and only works every now and then.’ Apparently, that is one worker who keeps their own equipment handy.
‘He’s normally a very quiet man. He just stepped in extremely calmly by having an axe and smashed all the machines. There were several customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But jail overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The 2nd of the two stories is a bit more terrifying, as the axe was wielded not at the slots, but at a member of the staff at a betting store in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting shop in Cardiff ‘in circumstances of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making down with a few cash, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over his head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or worse if he didn’t comply.
A authorities spokesperson investigating the criminal activity said that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s store at 9:30 pm in the night of the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant utilizing the tree-chopping weapon.
The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police described as a ‘quantity of cash,’ and the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven with a suspect that is third.
Police are now appealing to the neighborhood public for information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did maybe not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up in the scene.
Whose Casino Could It Be Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
While every of the 3 licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has received its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight throughout the casino slated to be found in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston mayoral candidate is threatening a lawsuit over one such proposal that would put a casino within the neighboring town of Everett.
The appropriate choice is linked to the theory that neighboring communities could be suffering from casino projects, but won’t have the opportunity to vote on whether those casinos must certanly be opened in the beginning. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, an applicant for mayor of Boston, is one of a handful of prospects whom have suggested that all of Boston should manage to vote on a casino that might be located in East Boston, as an example.
When it comes down to your proposed Wynn casino task in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote onto it is unfair to the surrounding communities. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would secrets to more chilli slots file suit to stop the Everett casino based regarding the impact it could have on many Boston neighborhoods.
‘The Wynn proposal was voted…on in just one community,’ Conley said throughout a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social receive none of the proposed advantages.’
In line with the state laws that produced the window of opportunity for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get a vote on whether or not to allow the projects to be built. However, casino designers are required to negotiate settlement, with arbitration required in the event that casinos and neighborhood governments can’t arrive at a resolution on their own.
Conley has proposed taking a path that is not actually outlined in the 2011 casino law regarding the East Boston casino proposal, one that’s being produced by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He could have the entire city of Boston vote on whether to accept the proposal, while still granting East Boston veto power within the entire vote. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
While Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposition, a Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in support of it, with just two coming away against it (with Conley and an added candidate not responding to the question). Meanwhile, four of ten candidates supported allowing the entire city to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents discovered that 44% were in favor of the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Even when voters back these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii while the site that is future of casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, addititionally there is a contending proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken up to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the rising celebrity of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got their own hand caught in the sports book cookie jar after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from a retired leading activities company that is betting.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a betting shop critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nonetheless accepted the big contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing users of the Conservative Party to call the shadow business secretary out, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double criteria.
Since Gala Coral Group is one associated with largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a many wagering outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the united states- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign targeted at reducing the spread of bookies and betting shops in the local roads of his London that is south Streatham, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to get a handle on the number of betting shops.’
‘I understand there is concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily filling with betting shops and cash advance organizations that take advantage of our community, as opposed to help us,’ wrote Umunna in a report to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna claims?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says something in public places and does another behind closed doors. His hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that is very uncommon for a politician.
Spared on a Technicality
However, fighting back in the corner of the Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna stated that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in accordance aided by the guidelines and correctly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the working workplace of Chuka Umunna in his ability as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, and for staffing,’ so it will officially pass as legitimate.
And even though Goulden is not any longer a relative mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether this is a entirely innocent donation or not, and whether or not the Conservative Party may just be looking to ruin the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after using this type of difficult stance against the spread of the industry in their neighborhood constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he undoubtedly believes is that the capital is filled with ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ advertised Bob Neill.
Umunna, that is thought to be considered a future Labour Party leader, has recently experienced his share that is fair of as earlier this present year their office ended up being accused of modifying their Wikipedia page to exhibit comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.